Association of sildenafil use with age-related macular degeneration: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Despite significant advances in clinical care and understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, age-related macular degeneration (AMD)-a major cause of global blindness-lacks effective treatment to prevent the irreversible degeneration of photoreceptors leading to central vision loss. Limited studies suggest phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, such as sildenafil, may prevent AMD by increasing retinal blood flow. This study explores the potential association between sildenafil use and AMD risk in men with erectile dysfunction using UK data. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Using the UK's IQVIA Medical Research Data, the study analysed 31 575 men prescribed sildenafil for erectile dysfunction and no AMD history from 2007 to 2015, matched with a comparator group of 62 155 non-sildenafil users in a 1:2 ratio, over a median follow-up of approximately three years. RESULTS: The primary outcome was the incidence of AMD in the two groups. The study found no significant difference in AMD incidence between the sildenafil users and the non-users, with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.99 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.16), after accounting for confounders such as age, ethnicity, Townsend deprivation quintile, body mass index category, and diagnosis of hypertension and type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSION: The study results indicated no significant association between sildenafil use and AMD prevention in UK men with erectile dysfunction, suggesting sildenafil's protective effect on AMD is likely insignificant.

A phase 1 study of regorafenib and sildenafil in adults with advanced solid tumors.

The purpose of this study is to establish the recommended phase 2 dose for regorafenib in combination with sildenafil for patients with advanced solid tumors. Secondary outcomes included identification of antitumor effects of regorafenib and sildenafil, toxicity of the combination, determination of PDE5 expression in tumor samples, and the impact of sildenafil on the pharmacokinetics of regorafenib. This study was a phase 1, open-label single-arm dose-escalation trial using a 3 + 3 design. Additional patients were enrolled at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) until a total of 12 patients were treated at the MTD. A total of 29 patients were treated in this study. The median duration of treatment was 8 weeks. The recommended phase 2 doses determined in this study are regorafenib 160 mg daily with sildenafil 100 mg daily. The most common toxicities included palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (20 patients, 69%) and hypophosphatemia (18 patients, 62%). Two patients (7%) experienced grade 4 lipase increase. Objective responses were not observed; however, 14 patients (48%) had a period of stable disease during the study. Stable disease for up to 12 months was observed in patients with ovarian cancer as well as up to 20 months for a patient with cervical cancer. The combination of regorafenib and sildenafil at the recommended phase 2 dose is safe and generally well tolerated. Disease control in patients with gynecologic malignancies was especially encouraging. Further evaluation of the combination of regorafenib and sildenafil in gynecologic malignancies is warranted. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT02466802.

Assessment of the treatment effectiveness of men with mild and medium degree of erectile dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: . Aim: To assess the effectiveness of monotherapy and complex treatment of patients with erectile dysfunction depending on its severity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: Men with moderate and mild erectile dysfunction took part in the study, who, in turn, were divided into groups, depending on the treatment, with the evaluation of the results of the International Index of Erectile Function (MIEF-15), the state of cavernous hemodynamics and the function of the vascular endothelium before and after treatment. RESULTS: Results: In patients with an average degree of severity, who received complex treatment including a course of low-energy shock wave therapy, against the background of taking sildenafil and L-arginine, the best results were obtained in the quality of erection and increased cavernous blood flow, which positively affected satisfaction with sexual intercourse and overall satisfaction. It has also been proven that the function of the endothelium was improved in patients receiving L-arginine, due to which there was a probable decrease in endothelin-1. A probable improvement of erectile function was obtained in the group of patients with a mild degree who received L-arginine, and there was no statistical difference from the indicators in the group who received sildenafil, which was confirmed by the data of dopplerography. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Patients with an average degree of erectile dysfunction require comprehensive treatment. The use of L-arginine can be an alternative to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in the treatment of mild erectile dysfunction.

Sildenafil Use and Cigarette Smoking Associated with Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Rare Case Report.

Background: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a serious condition characterized by bleeding within the brain tissue. Although the use of sildenafil, a vasodilator agent for erectile dysfunction, has been associated with rare cases of ICH, the combination of sildenafil usage and smoking as risk factors for ICH has not yet been reported. This case report describes the occurrence of ICH in a patient with a history of both sildenafil usage and heavy smoking. Case Presentation: A 53-year-old male, with a history of smoking and regular sildenafil use, was brought to the emergency department due to loss of consciousness with right-side weakness, he initially experienced with nausea, vomiting and dizziness after taking sildenafil 100mg tablet once. The Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) was 10 with side hemiparesis. Non-contrast CT revealed left thalamic acute hemorrhage with ventricular extension. Furthermore, a head CT angiography ruled out any vascular anomalies after that the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for conservative management. After three days on clinical and neurological improvement, the patient was transferred to the inpatient ward for further management, monitoring and physiotherapy. On day 6, the patient was discharged and planned for flow up. Conclusion: This rare case highlights the need for further research and awareness regarding the potential risks associated with the combination of sildenafil and heavy smoking. Healthcare professionals should carefully evaluate the individual risk factors of patients, educate them about potential complications, and consider alternative treatments if necessary. Additionally, patients should be encouraged to quit smoking and adopt a healthy lifestyle to minimize the risk of cerebrovascular events.

Oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors and priapism: A VigiBase analysis.

PURPOSE: To explore the differences of priapism events among a diverse cohort taking erectogenic medicines (i.e., phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors [PDE5i] and intracavernousal drugs). METHODS: We queried the World Health Organization global database of individual case safety reports (VigiBase) for records of the adverse drug reactions (ADR) with sildenafil, tadalafil, avanafil, vardenafil, papaverine, and alprostadil. Disproportionality analyses (case/non-case approach) were performed to assess the reporting odds ratio (ROR) of priapism reporting in PDE5i consumers compared to intracavernousal drug recipients. RESULTS: From a total of 133 819 ADR events for erectogenic medications, 632 were priapism (PDE5is: n = 550, 0.41%; intracavernousal drugs: n = 82, 9.92%). Priapism disproportionality signals from intracavernousal drugs were 25 times stronger than PDE5is (ROR = 34.7; confidence interval [CI] 95%: 27.12-43.94 vs. ROR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.24-1.54). For all PDE5i agents, the 12-17 years age group had the highest ROR (9.49, 95% CI: 3.76-19.93) followed by 2-11 years (4.31, 95% CI: 1.57-9.4). Disproportionality signals for consumers under 18 for both all PDE5is as a whole (ROR = 4.57, 95% CI: 2.48-7.73) and sildenafil (ROR = 4.89, 95% CI: 2.51-8.62) were stronger than individuals 18 or older (ROR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.93-1.21 and ROR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.91-1.26, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: PDE5i use shows disproportionate priapism signals which are higher in young patients.

Feasibility and Safety of Sildenafil to Repair Brain Injury Secondary to Birth Asphyxia (SANE-01): A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase Ib Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test feasibility and safety of administering sildenafil in neonates with neonatal encephalopathy (NE), developing brain injury despite therapeutic hypothermia (TH). STUDY DESIGN: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase Ib clinical trial between 2016 and 2019 in neonates with moderate or severe NE, displaying brain injury on day-2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) despite TH. Neonates were randomized (2:1) to 7-day sildenafil or placebo (2 mg/kg/dose enterally every 12 hours, 14 doses). Outcomes included feasibility and safety (primary outcomes), pharmacokinetics (secondary), and day-30 neuroimaging and 18-month neurodevelopment assessments (exploratory). RESULTS: Of the 24 enrolled neonates, 8 were randomized to sildenafil and 3 to placebo. A mild decrease in blood pressure was reported in 2 of the 8 neonates after initial dose, but not with subsequent doses. Sildenafil plasma steady-state concentration was rapidly reached, but decreased after TH discontinuation. Twelve percent of neonates (1/8) neonates died in the sildenafil group and 0% (0/3) in the placebo group. Among surviving neonates, partial recovery of injury, fewer cystic lesions, and less brain volume loss on day-30 magnetic resonance imaging were noted in 71% (5/7) of the sildenafil group and in 0% (0/3) of the placebo group. The rate of death or survival to 18 months with severe neurodevelopmental impairment was 57% (4/7) in the sildenafil group and 100% (3/3) in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil was safe and well-absorbed in neonates with NE treated with TH. Optimal dosing needs to be established. Evaluation of a larger number of neonates through subsequent phases II and III trials is required to establish efficacy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT02812433.

[Methemoglobinemia Induced by Sildenafil Tablets Ordered in the Darknet - Importance of Syncopes' Causes]. / Methämoglobinämie durch Sildenafil-Tabletten aus dem Darknet.

Drug-induced methemoglobinemia is a well-known phenomenon as well as induction by poppers (alcylnitrites substance group). Usually, suspicion is thrown in the right direction by a thorough medical history and environmental survey. But if intoxication is unintended and happens within the very private environment diagnosis might be very tricky. We report on an unusual case of accidental intoxication with probably contaminated tablets which were bought in the darknet. Finally, diagnosis was made by blood gas analysis' methemoglobine values.

Erectile response profiles of men using PDE5 inhibitors combined with intracavernosal injections as part of a penile rehabilitation program after radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor labeling states that these agents should not be used in conjunction with other erectogenic medications for fear of priapism occurring. AIM: We explored the risk of priapism and prolonged erections in men in our post-radical prostatectomy (RP) penile injection program who were using regular PDE5 inhibitor and intracavernosal injections (ICIs) as part of their rehabilitation program. METHODS: The study cohort included men on penile injection therapy who (1) were taking tadalafil 5 mg daily or taking sildenafil 25 mg on noninjection days, (2) had an RP, (3) were using their respective PDE5 inhibitor regularly at the time of penile injection training, and (4) complied with the program instructions regarding penile injection use. Demographics, comorbidity details, PDE5 inhibitor dose and utilization, and injection dose and utilization data were collected. All patients underwent in-office injection training and used trimix (papaverine/phentolamine/prostaglandin E1) as the intracavernosal medication. OUTCOMES: Priapism was defined as a patient self-reported penetration hardness erection ≥4 hours in duration, while prolonged erection was defined as a penetration hardness erection lasting ≥2 hours. RESULTS: A total of 112 tadalafil users and 364 sildenafil users were compared. Mean age and duration post-RP were 62 ± 14 years and 5.2 ± 12 months, respectively, and there was no difference between tadalafil and sildenafil groups. The mean trimix dose was tadalafil 24 ± 24 units and sildenafil 31 ± 37 units (P < .05). Priapism occurred in 2 (1.7%) of 112 tadalafil users and 5 (1.4%) of 364 sildenafil users (P = .47). Excluding those men experiencing priapism on any occasion, those with any reported penetration hardness erection lasting ≥2 hours were 7 (6.3%) of 112 tadalafil users and 12 (3.3%) of 364 sildenafil users (P < .01). A total of 53% of these prolonged erections occurred within the first 6 injections at home (no difference between tadalafil and sildenafil groups). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: We emphasize the need for continued monitoring and education on proper injection techniques to minimize the risk of adverse events in ICI and PDE5 inhibitor combination therapy. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This study has a relatively large patient population with a considerable follow-up time. Additionally, the rigorous training, education, and monitoring of the participants, as well as the use of formal definitions for priapism and prolonged erections, enhances the accuracy and reliability of the results. However, there are some limitations, such as social desirability, confounding factors, and recall bias. CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in the incidence of priapism in an ICI program in which men combine ICI with tadalafil or sildenafil. However, tadalafil patients had a higher rate of prolonged erections, which was found to occur mostly early during the titration phase.

Unmasking hidden risks: The surprising link between PDE5 inhibitors and seizure susceptibility.

BACKGROUND: Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) are the first line treatment for erectile dysfunction; however, several articles and case reports have shown central nervous system effects, that can cause seizures in susceptible patients. This study aims to describe the changes caused by the use of Sildenafil and Tadalafil through the analysis of abnormalities expressed in the electrocorticogram (ECoG) of rats and evaluate the seizure threshold response and treatment of seizures with anticonvulsants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study used 108 rats (Wistar). Before surgery for electrode placement in dura mater, the animals were randomly separated into 3 experiments for electrocorticogram analysis. Experiment 1: ECoG response to using PD5i (Sildenafil 20mg/kg and Tadalafil 2.6mg/kg p.o.). Experiment 2: ECoG response to the use of PD5i in association with Pentylenetetrazole (PTZ-30 mg/kg i.p.), a convulsive model. Experiment 3: ECoG response to anticonvulsant treatment (Phenytoin, Phenobarbital and Diazepam) of seizures induced by association IPDE5 + PTZ. All recordings were made thirty minutes after administration of the medication and analyzed for ten minutes, only once. We considered statistical significance level of *p<0.05, **p<0.01 and ***p < 0.001. RESULTS: After administration of Sildenafil and Tadalafil, there were increases in the power of recordings in the frequency bands in oscillations in alpha (p = 0.0920) and beta (p = 0.602) when compared to the control group (p<0.001). After the use of Sildenafil and Tadalafil associated with PTZ, greater potency was observed in the recordings during seizures (p<0.001), however, the Sildenafil group showed greater potency when compared to Tadalafil (p<0.05). Phenobarbital and Diazepam showed a better response in controlling discharges triggered by the association between proconvulsant drugs. CONCLUSIONS: PDE5i altered the ECoG recordings in the rats' motor cortexes, demonstrating cerebral asynchrony and potentiating the action of PTZ. These findings demonstrate that PDE5i can lower the seizure threshold.

Central retinal vein and artery occlusion associated with sildenafil: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Sildenafil is a selective phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension. It is available over the counter in many countries. While there have been a few reports of retinal vascular occlusion following sildenafil consumption, most cases have other comorbidities as risk factors for the disease, and the exact causal role of this drug in these conditions remains unclear. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a healthy 32-year-old Iranian man who developed combined central retinal vein occlusion and retinal artery occlusion following sildenafil exposure. The patient underwent a hypercoagulative state workup for possible underlying risk factors. Additionally, we conducted a literature search on PubMed using the keywords: retinal vein occlusion AND Sildenafil OR Viagra, retinal artery occlusion AND Sildenafil OR Viagra, retinal vascular occlusion AND Sildenafil OR Viagra. To obtain more objective results in the reviews, we employed an adverse drug reaction possibility algorithm. The patient was found to be otherwise healthy, and ancillary tests were unremarkable. A literature review identified seven reports of retinal vascular occlusion following sildenafil use. In most of these cases, the role of sildenafil was not clearly established. To the best of our knowledge, our case achieved the highest score based on the algorithm compared with previous reports. CONCLUSION: Sildenafil may be associated with severe retinal vascular accidents in otherwise healthy young individuals.

[Evaluation of the efficiency and safety of the dispersed form of sildenafil (50 mg) in males with erectile dysfunction].

INTRODUCTION: The erectile dysfunction is defined as an inability to achieve or maintain an erection sufficient for sexual intercourse lasting more than 3 months. According to literature, about 90 million men worldwide suffer from erectile dysfunction of different severity. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the dispersed form of sildenafil ("Ridzhamp" 50 mg), compared with the standard tablets of sildenafil (50 mg). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 60 men aged 27 to 67 years (average age 40.2 years) with moderate erectile dysfunction (11-15 points according to IIEF-5). In group I (n=30), patients took a dispersible form of the drug sildenafil, 50 mg ("Ridzhamp") 60 minutes before sexual intercourse; in group II (n=30), a standard form of the drug sildenafil was prescribed at a dosage of 50 mg, 60 minutes before sexual intercourse. RESULTS: Positive dynamics according to IIEF-5 score was found in all the study groups. In group I, IIEF-5 score increase by 53.85%, while in group II by 50% (p<0.05). The average onset of erection in group I was 45+/-2.2 min, while in group II it was 51+/-1.9 min. In the main group (group I) one patient (3.33%) complained of persistent headache after taking the drug, and therefore refused the therapy. In the comparison group (group II) one patient (3.33%) reported dyspeptic disorders while taking the drug, 1 patient (3.33%) reported dizziness. All patients in the main group noted the convenience of taking the "Ridzhamp". CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate the comparable efficiency of the dispersed form of sildenafil (group I) and the standard tablet form of the drug (group II). All patients in the main group (group I) noted a faster onset of erections, as well as the convenience of "Ridzhamp" and the ability to take the drug without water intake.

Sildenafil Vs. Tadalafil for The Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Single-arm Self-controlled Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and adverse events of sildenafil monotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with its FDA-approved counterpart, tadalafil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-arm self-controlled clinical trial, 33 patients were enrolled. All patients underwent a 6-week treatment with sildenafil, followed by a 4-week washout period and finally a 6-week treatment with tadalafil. Patients were examined on each appointment and post-void residual (PVR) urine, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Quality of life index (IPSS-QoL index) were recorded subsequently. Efficacy of each drug regimen was then evaluated by comparing these outcome parameters. RESULTS: Both sildenafil and tadalafil were shown to improve PVR (both p < .001), IPSS (both p < .001) and IPSS- QoL index (both p < .001) significantly. Sildenafil was more effective than tadalafil in reducing PVR (mean difference (95%CI) = 9.91% (4.11, 15.72), p < .001) and ameliorating IPSS-QoL index (mean difference (95%CI) = 19.3% (4.47, 34.41), p = .027). Moreover, although not significant, sildenafil reduced IPSS more than tadalafil (mean difference (95%CI) = 3.33% (-0.22, 6.87), p = .065). Concurrent erectile dysfunction did not affect responsiveness to therapy with either sildenafil or tadalafil but age was inversely related to post-treatment IPSS in both sildenafil (B = 0.21 (0.04, 0.37), p = .015) and tadalafil (B = 0.14 (0.02, 0.26), p = .021) regimens with a more prominent role in responsiveness to sildenafil (ß = 0.31) compared to tadalafil (ß = 0.19). CONCLUSION: Considering the significantly better improvement of PVR and IPSS-Qol index with sildenafil, this drug can be nominated as a suitable alternative for tadalafil as a BPH treatment, especially in younger patients who don't have any contraindications.

Using Big Data to Uncover Association Between Sildenafil Use and Reduced Risk of Alzheimer's Disease.

Alzheimer's disease is a chronic neurodegenerative disease with multiple pathogenesis pathways. Sildenafil, one of the phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, was proven to have effective benefits in transgenic Alzheimer's disease mice. The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship between sildenafil use and the risk of Alzheimer's disease based on the IBM® MarketScan® Database covering over 30 million employees and family members per year. Sildenafil and non-sildenafil-matched cohorts were generated using propensity-score matching with the greedy nearest-neighbor algorithm. The propensity score stratified univariate analysis and the Cox regression model showed that sildenafil use was significantly associated with a 60% risk reduction of developing Alzheimer's disease (HR=0.40; 95%CI:0.38-0.44; P<.0001) compared to the cohort of individuals who did not take sildenafil. Sex-stratified analyses revealed that sildenafil was related to a lower risk of Alzheimer's disease in subgroups of both males and females. Our findings demonstrated a significant association between sildenafil use and a lower risk of Alzheimer's disease.

Adverse reactions of PDE5 inhibitors: An analysis of the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database.

BACKGROUND: Despite their efficacy and general safety, rare but devastating adverse drug reactions have been associated with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors. OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety profile of oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors with a particular focus on priapism and malignant melanoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this case-non-case study, we queried the individual case safety reports for phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors within the World Health Organization global database of individual case safety reports (VigiBase) between 1983 and 2021. We included all individual case safety reports for sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, and avanafil in men. For comparison, we also extracted the safety data from the Food and Drug Administration trials for these drugs. We assessed the safety profile of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors by disproportionality analysis by measuring reporting odds ratio for their most commonly reported adverse drug reactions, once for all phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor reports and once for reports of oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor use in adult men (≥18 years old) with sexual dysfunction. RESULTS: A total of 94,713 individual case safety reports for phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors were extracted. A total of 31,827 individual case safety reports were identified relating to adult men taking oral sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, or avanafil for sexual dysfunction. The most common adverse drug reactions included poor drug efficacy (42.5%), headache (10.4% vs. 8.5%-27.6% [Food and Drug Administration]), abnormal vision (8.4% vs. ≤4.6% [Food and Drug Administration]), flushing (5.2% vs. 5.1%-16.5% [Food and Drug Administration]), and dyspepsia (4.2% vs. 3.4%-11.1% [Food and Drug Administration]). Priapism showed significant signals for sildenafil (reporting odds ratio = 13.81, 95% confidence interval: 11.75-16.24), tadalafil (reporting odds ratio = 14.54, 95% confidence interval: 11.56-18.06), and vardenafil (reporting odds ratio = 14.12, 95% confidence interval: 8.36-22.35). Comparing with other medications in VigiBase, sildenafil (reporting odds ratio = 8.73, 95% confidence interval: 7.63-9.99) and tadalafil (reporting odds ratio = 4.25, 95% confidence interval: 3.19-5.55) had significantly higher reporting odds ratios for malignant melanoma. CONCLUSION: Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors show significant signals correlating with priapism among a large international cohort. Further clinical study is needed to elucidate whether this is from proper or inappropriate use or other confounding conditions, as analysis of pharmacovigilance data does not allow for quantifying the clinical risk. Also, there appears to be a relationship between phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor use and malignant melanoma, which warrants additional study to better understand causation.

Differences in Efficacy and Safety of Sirolimus and Sildenafil in Pediatric Lymphatic Malformations.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the differences in the efficacy and safety of oral sirolimus and sildenafil in the treatment of pediatric intractable lymphatic malformations (LMs). METHODS: From January 2014 to May 2022, we retrospectively enrolled children with intractable LMs treated with oral drugs (sirolimus or sildenafil) and divided the patients into sirolimus and sildenafil groups from Beijing Children's Hospital (BCH). Clinical features, treatment, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. The indicators were the ratio of reduction in lesion volume pre and posttreatment, the number of patients with improved clinical symptoms, and adverse reactions to the two drugs. RESULTS: Twenty-four children in the sildenafil group and 31 children in the sirolimus group were included in the present study. The effective rate in the sildenafil group was 54.2% (13/24), with a median lesion volume reduction ratio of 0.32 (-0.23, 0.89) and clinical symptoms improved in 19 patients (79.2%). On the contrary, the effective rate in the sirolimus group was 93.5% (29/31), with a median lesion volume reduction ratio of 0.68 (0.34, 0.96), and clinical symptoms improved in 30 patients (96.8%). There were significant differences (p < 0.05) between the two groups. Regarding safety, four patients in the sildenafil group and 23 patients in the sirolimus group with mild adverse reactions were reported. CONCLUSION: Both sildenafil and sirolimus can reduce the volume of LMs and improve clinical symptoms in partial patients with intractable LMs. Sirolimus is more effective than sildenafil and the adverse reactions associated with both drugs are mild and controllable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III Laryngoscope, 133:3192-3199, 2023.

Rare fatal effect of combined use of sildenafil and alcohol leading to Cerebrovascular Accident.

Sildenafil is the first internationally approved drug for erectile dysfunction. Unsupervised and non-prescribed use of sildenafil among young Indian population has increased in last few years. Sildenafil helps in erection of penis by inhibiting the action of Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) enzyme, present in the vasculature of corpus cavernosum muscle and lengthens the duration of erection. Documented adverse effects of sildenafil are headache, flushing, nasal congestion, dyspepsia, and slight decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. We present a rare case of sudden death due to cerebrovascular hemorrhage after sildenafil use and concomitant alcohol intake. The history is that a 41-year-old male with no significant past medical and surgical history was staying at a hotel room with a female friend; he had consumed 2 tablets of sildenafil (50 mg each) and alcohol at night. Next morning, he developed uneasiness following which he was taken to the Hospital where he was declared dead on arrival. The important autopsy findings include edematous brain with about 300 g of clotted blood in the right basal ganglia extending to bilateral ventricles, and in pons region. Other significant findings on microscopic examination were hypertrophic ventricular wall of heart, fatty changes in liver and acute tubular necrosis and hypertensive changes in the kidney. The findings are discussed in the light of the literature about the lethal complications of combined use of sildenafil and alcohol including cerebrovascular accidents. As a forensic pathologist it is the duty of the doctor to execute meticulous autopsy along with ancillary investigations including toxicological analysis and to correlate all these findings to determine the possible effects of drugs when present, so as to gather knowledge about potentially fatal drugs and further create public awareness regarding the same.

Evaluation of the Influence of Sildenafil on the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Vericiguat in Healthy Adults.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Vericiguat is approved for the treatment of patients with heart failure with ejection fraction < 45%. Sildenafil, indicated for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, is a potential co-medication in male patients. This study investigated the safety and tolerability of co-administration of vericiguat and sildenafil in healthy volunteers. METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in 32 healthy white male volunteers. Participants received vericiguat 10 mg or placebo once daily for 16 days. Both groups received single doses of sildenafil (25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg) on days 13-15. Safety, hemodynamic changes, and pharmacokinetic effects were assessed. RESULTS: All subjects in the vericiguat group and seven (43.8%) in the placebo group reported one or more treatment-emergent adverse events, all of mild or moderate intensity. Decreases in seated blood pressure (≤ 5.4 mmHg) with the vericiguat-sildenafil combination compared with placebo-sildenafil were small and there was no evidence of a sildenafil dose-related effect. Standing blood pressure and standing and seated heart rate were similar between treatment groups. Co-administration of sildenafil did not affect vericiguat pharmacokinetics. A mild increase in sildenafil exposure (≤ 22%) when co-administered with vericiguat was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Adding single doses of sildenafil to vericiguat 10 mg once daily at steady state was well tolerated and produced a minimal reduction in seated blood pressure (≤ 5.4 mmHg) compared with administration of sildenafil alone. There was no effect of sildenafil on vericiguat pharmacokinetics, and an increase in sildenafil exposure with vericiguat co-administration was not clinically relevant. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT no. 2015-004997-14.

Vericiguat is approved for the treatment of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Sildenafil is a treatment for erectile dysfunction. This study investigated whether sildenafil was safe to use in individuals treated with vericiguat. In total, 32 healthy white male volunteers were randomly allocated to receive either vericiguat 10 mg or placebo once daily for 16 days. Both groups received single doses of sildenafil (25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg) on days 13­15. Co-administration of single doses of sildenafil and vericiguat 10 mg was well tolerated. All side effects were of mild or moderate intensity, and the addition of sildenafil to vericiguat had a minimal effect on blood pressure. Giving these drugs together did not alter the way either drug was absorbed, distributed, or eliminated by the body to a clinically relevant extent.